evaluation

Testing AI systems means looking for failures
before they matter in the real world.

This page explains what SIGNALWATCH checks: degraded images, missed detections, unstable confidence, source links, and whether results trace back to real evidence.

explain the terms
Perception robustness

Vision systems can lose reliability when input quality changes: blur, low light, occlusion, compression, cropping, and motion can alter what the model reports.

evidence / Browser-side COCO-SSD lab
evidence / real detection outputs only
Evaluation reliability

Evaluation is not only a score. It asks whether tests look like the real places where the AI system will be used.

evidence / OpenAI Preparedness Framework
evidence / NIST AI RMF
When the real world changes

Models can behave differently when images, tasks, users, tools, or settings are different from the examples used during development.

evidence / NIST AI RMF
evidence / frontier-risk frameworks
Visible failures

A robust system should show missed detections, unstable confidence, disappearing objects, stale sources, and uncertainty instead of hiding them.

evidence / model output history
evidence / source links
Monitoring requirements

Real systems need timestamps, source links, model-output history, confidence history, and clear examples of what changed.

evidence / SIGNALWATCH console
evidence / methodology boundary
Frontier evaluation gaps

More capable systems require evaluation of autonomy, cyber misuse, CBRN misuse, persuasion, loss-of-control risk, safeguards, and post-deployment monitoring.

evidence / OpenAI Preparedness
evidence / Anthropic RSP
evaluation labels in plain language
plain language / trust boundary
Real

Observed or sourced

A source link, timestamp, runtime event, or model output exists. The interface can point back to where it came from.

Derived

Calculated from real inputs

A summary, grouping, or trace built from source activity, telemetry, or model-output history. It should still show its inputs.

Conceptual

Explanation, not measurement

A teaching example that explains a risk or system behavior without claiming it happened in a deployed system.

Simulated

Controlled demonstration

A parameter-driven demo. Useful for learning, but not evidence about the outside world unless real inputs are attached.

before and after: why evaluation gets hard
source photos / visual demonstration only

These examples use real source photos to show how ordinary image quality problems can make AI behavior less reliable. They are visual examples only; detection boxes and confidence must still come from an actual model run.

Low-light route trace
original
Low-light route trace with visual degradation
darker input
low light

Low light can hide ordinary detail

A person can still understand the scene. A vision model may lose confidence or miss objects.

Real-world implication: Useful for hallway cameras, night routes, warehouses, and indoor robots.

source / Wikimedia Commons derivative / SIGNALWATCH grade
Temporal motion trace
original
Temporal motion trace with visual degradation
blurred input
motion blur

Motion can smear object boundaries

Movement makes edges less clear, which can make detections jump or disappear between frames.

Real-world implication: Useful for traffic scenes, handheld cameras, moving robots, and fast workspaces.

source / Wikimedia Commons derivative / SIGNALWATCH grade
Camera placement boundary
original
Camera placement boundary with visual degradation
cropped view
camera placement

Placement changes what the system can know

A camera angle can make important context visible, hidden, cropped, or too far away.

Real-world implication: Useful for placement reviews, coverage audits, and blind-spot analysis.

source / Wikimedia Commons derivative / SIGNALWATCH grade
Sensor calibration boundary
original
Sensor calibration boundary with visual degradation
reduced context
sensor boundary

Sensors have their own boundaries

Specialized sensors can reveal one kind of signal while hiding other context the model may need.

Real-world implication: Useful for thermal systems, calibration checks, and mixed-sensor deployments.

source / Wikimedia Commons derivative / SIGNALWATCH grade
Coverage mesh deployment
original
Coverage mesh deployment with visual degradation
partial coverage
coverage

Coverage is never the whole scene

Multiple cameras can still leave gaps. The system can only reason from what the sensors actually see.

Real-world implication: Useful for multi-camera monitoring, maintenance planning, and handoff between views.

source / Wikimedia Commons derivative / SIGNALWATCH grade
evaluation evidence boundary
real inputs / real outputs / explicit unavailable states
source data

papers, releases, policy pages, ingested records

traceable
model behavior

browser-side detections, confidence, timing, empty frames

observed
evidence packet

timestamps, frame history, continuity markers, exported JSON

recorded
claim boundary

missing data stays unavailable; outcomes are not prewritten

enforced
real source

Claims need source records or ingestion events.

model output only

Confidence and detections come from inference.

unavailable is valid

Missing data stays visible instead of guessed.

no prefilled claims

Protocols do not ship with conclusions.

perception robustness interface
real outputs only

The perception lab changes webcam or uploaded frames before running browser-side COCO-SSD. Boxes, confidence, replay, and empty-frame counts are computed only from what the model actually reports.

blur
low light
occlusion
compression
crop instability
motion blur
open perception lab
failure visibility
observable failure states
missed detection

object is present, but the model emits no detection

confidence instability

confidence changes across adjacent degraded frames

identity switching

detected class changes as input conditions shift

temporal inconsistency

object continuity breaks across recent frames

frame integrity loss

recent inference frames produce no usable detections

evaluation evidence packet shape
schema preview / values require real run
schema
signalwatch.perception.evidence.v1
generatedAt
set when a real run is exported
model
browser-side COCO-SSD when loaded
inferenceBoundary
local browser inference only
observationWindow
derived from actual frame timestamps
frames
empty until frames are observed
detections
empty until model emits detections
continuityTransitions
computed from emitted class history
non-populated export shape
{
  "schema": "signalwatch.perception.evidence.v1",
  "generatedAt": "<real export timestamp>",
  "model": "<loaded browser model>",
  "inferenceBoundary": "real outputs only",
  "frames": [],
  "detections": [],
  "continuityTransitions": []
}
evaluation unavailable states
absence is observable / absence is not guessed
model unavailable
perception lab

If browser-side inference cannot load, detections remain unavailable instead of simulated.

no detections emitted
model output

Empty frames are recorded as empty frames; no bounding boxes or confidence values are fabricated.

collector offline
source ingestion

Source health reports offline or delayed states directly through collector telemetry.

insufficient window
evaluation

Temporal claims wait until a real observation window has enough frames or source events.

packet not exported
evidence packet

The interface can show the export schema without pretending an evidence packet exists.

source missing
provenance

A claim without a usable source trace should stay unresolved, not become narrative filler.

evaluation visual context
illustrative photos / not model evidence

These photos show ordinary conditions that can make evaluation harder: low light, camera placement, motion blur, monitoring rooms, sensor boundaries, and coverage limits. They are source-attributed context images, not precomputed detections or benchmark results.

visual role
operational context
source status
externally attributed
evidence boundary
not inference output
operational case studies
reproducible protocols / evidence generated locally

SIGNALWATCH case studies are short engineering records for running degradation protocols, collecting model-output evidence, and documenting observed failure states without prefilled conclusions.

open case studies
source registry visual
collector type / provenance / runtime state
arXiv
UNOBSERVED
type / research
provenance / paper metadata / source URL
runtime / awaiting collector frame
OpenAI
UNOBSERVED
type / release stream
provenance / publisher page / timestamp
runtime / awaiting collector frame
Anthropic
UNOBSERVED
type / release stream
provenance / publisher page / timestamp
runtime / awaiting collector frame
OpenAI Policy
UNOBSERVED
type / policy
provenance / official framework source
runtime / awaiting collector frame
GitHub
UNOBSERVED
type / repository
provenance / repo URL / trend route
runtime / awaiting collector frame
Alignment Forum
UNOBSERVED
type / discourse
provenance / forum post / fetch record
runtime / awaiting collector frame
perception dataset registry
5 protocols / 0 asset-backed

The current registry defines real capture/import protocols for robustness sequences. It does not ship fabricated detections, expected confidence values, or precomputed continuity claims.

low-light
capture required
occlusion
capture required
motion
capture required
compression
capture required
continuity
capture required
evaluation source registry
framework-backed / no fabricated policy claims